Beauty and personal care essentials - 糖心Vlog /health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care You deserve better, safer and fairer products and services. We're the people working to make that happen. Mon, 30 Mar 2026 01:06:04 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 /wp-content/uploads/2024/12/favicon.png?w=32 Beauty and personal care essentials - 糖心Vlog /health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care 32 32 239272795 Proposed sunscreen reforms welcome in wake of 糖心Vlog investigation /health-and-body/articles/proposed-sunscreen-reforms-welcome-in-wake-of-choice-investigation Thu, 26 Mar 2026 01:18:00 +0000 /?p=1071954 The TGA has commenced consultation on proposed changes to sunscreen regulation in Australia.

The post Proposed sunscreen reforms welcome in wake of 糖心Vlog investigation appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>

Need to know

  • The 糖心Vlog sunscreen investigation in 2025 resulted in more than 20 sunscreens being pulled from sale in Australia due to concerns they did not meet the SPF claims on their labels.
  • Following the 糖心Vlog investigation, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) opened consultation on several proposed changes to how sunscreen is regulated in Australia.
  • The TGA’s proposed changes aim to improve the reliability and transparency of sun protection factor (SPF) testing, enable new testing technologies, and strengthen oversight of testing laboratories, among other improved outcomes.

The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has announced it has commenced consultation on a list of proposed reforms to the way that sunscreen is regulated, manufactured and tested in Australia.

糖心Vlog Director of Campaigns Andy Kelly says: 鈥溙切腣log welcomes the TGA鈥檚 announcement today that it has opened consultation on a number of proposed changes to how sunscreen is regulated in Australia.

“Sunscreen regulation has been top of mind for the Australian public since 糖心Vlog raised the alarm last year on test results revealing that 16 of 20 sunscreens failed to meet their SPF claims, including one product with an SPF of only 4.鈥

We commend the TGA for acting

糖心Vlog Director of Campaigns Andy Kelly

Kelly says that proposals to improve and expand testing requirements, require accreditation for testing laboratories, and increase transparency will help restore consumer trust in the reliability of SPF claims.

“While there are some options we don鈥檛 support, such as replacing the current SPF numbering system, we commend the TGA for acting,鈥 adds Kelly.

Proposed changes to sunscreen regulation in Australia

The TGA consultation paper proposes a number of options to provide the following improvements to the current regulatory framework:

  • Improve reliability and transparency of sun protection factor (SPF) testing.
  • Enable new testing technologies to be adopted in a more timely manner.
  • Strengthen oversight of testing laboratories.
  • Enhance lifecycle quality assurance (e.g. periodic testing and ingredient standards).
  • Simplify and clarify SPF labelling.
  • Provide聽greater consistency with the indications that therapeutic and cosmetic sunscreens can make.
  • Update Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidance to improve manufacturing quality.

糖心Vlog investigation revealed need for stronger regulation

Following 糖心Vlog sunscreen investigation in 2025, over 20 sunscreens were pulled from sale in Australia due to concerns that they did not meet the SPF claims on their label.

“Without this investigation, it鈥檚 likely these products would still be available for sale 鈥 a clear example of why we urgently need stronger regulation in the sunscreen sector,鈥 says Kelly.

鈥淚n a country where two in three people will be diagnosed with some form of skin cancer in their lifetime, it鈥檚 vital that consumers can rely on SPF claims when purchasing products to protect their skin from the harsh Australian sun.

“We look forward to working with the TGA to ensure this will be the case going into the future.鈥

Get product reviews, tips to save money and stay informed with our free weekly newsletter.

Read our privacy policy

The post Proposed sunscreen reforms welcome in wake of 糖心Vlog investigation appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
1071954 sunscreens sales tickets and energy bills
What to know when buying a hair dryer /health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care/hair-care-and-removal/buying-guides/hair-dryers Thu, 11 Dec 2025 03:07:00 +0000 /uncategorized/post/hair-dryers/ Does ceramic or ionic technology really give you a better blow dry?

The post What to know when buying a hair dryer appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
You can’t always get to a hairdresser for a professional blow dry, so you want a hair dryer at home that helps you get that salon-like finish.听

On this page:

These days consumers have access to the formerly secret world of professional hair dryers, but they come with marketing terms like ‘ionic’ and ‘tourmaline’ that make them sound more like science experiments than hair-care tools. So what do you need to know to find the best dryer for you?

A good hair dryer will dry your hair quickly, while providing an effective range of temperature and airflow settings to help you create your desired style. If it’s not achieving this as a minimum, it’s just blowing hot air.听

Are expensive hair dryers worth it?

The main thing people expect hair dryers to do is dry hair fast, but it’s also important that a hair dryer is lightweight, easy to use and comfortable to hold.听

Then there are the various features and accessories. We’ve found concentrators are the most commonly used accessory, while the cool-shot function is the most commonly used feature.

Several models in our test under $100 outperform their costly counterparts

So when it comes to buying a hair dryer, should you blow your cash on a high-end model, or will a cheap and cheerful one do?

Whether you want to invest in the $649 Dyson or get one for under $100, we recommend a range of models in our latest聽hair dryer reviews聽to suit your hair care regime and budget.听

Our testing shows price isn’t always an indicator of performance, with several models under $100 outperforming their costly counterparts.

Ionic, ceramic, tourmaline 鈥 what does it all mean?

Many hair dryers come with technologies that claim to provide a professional result, but is it all just hot air? Our tests didn’t indicate that these technologies improve hair dryer performance.

Ionic

Ionic technology claims to condition hair by using negatively charged ions, which are created by passing air over an electric current. It’s said to dry hair faster, retain moisture to keep hair healthy and smooth, and create less static to reduce frizz.

Ceramic

Ceramic technology is said to control the heat to provide even heat distribution and add shine while protecting hair from frizz and damage.

Tourmaline

This technology generates negative ions with the aim of speeding up drying while reducing static.

Does oil coating make a difference?

Some brands advertise various oil infusions, like shea oil, which supposedly add nutrients, help fight frizz, soften hair and more. Our tests didn’t uncover any evidence to support these claims but some models did leave a slight mark on the cloth used for our drying rate tests.

We also didn’t find any vessels that could contain the oil in these dryers. Instead, it’s likely that the manufacturers simply apply a coating to an element or grill, which isn’t likely to last very long or be able to be replenished.

Based on our test results, oil infusions don’t improve hair dryer performance.

Features to look for in a hair dryer

Manoeuvrability, size and weight: Have a hold of the hair dryer instore before you buy. Get a feel for how comfortable it is to hold and see if it’s well balanced.

Switches:聽These should be accessible, easy to operate and well-labelled. Sliding switches are set in the handle and can be hard to use if they’re stiff, lack grip or don’t stick out enough. Rocker switches require you to push the raised end down and can be easier to use, but can be activated accidentally.

Multiple heat and airflow settings:聽Separate settings for heat and air speed will give you more control. The highest settings are ideal to remove the moisture from your hair while the lower settings are best for styling.

Cool-shot setting:聽This provides a burst of cool air which is supposed to be good for setting a style in place.

Storage hook/loop:聽It’s a good idea to hang a dryer on the wall and away from wet bathroom surfaces.

Concentrator:聽This narrows and concentrates the airflow where you want it. It’s designed for spot-drying and controlled styling.

Diffuser/volumiser:聽Diffusers with short fingers are designed to dry curly hair by spreading the airflow to prevent frizz. Diffusers with longer fingers 鈥 sometimes called volumisers 鈥 are designed to add volume to all types of hair by directing heat to the roots.

Turbo:聽The turbo shot or boost feature increases airflow through the hair dryer to speed up drying.

How to identify a hair dryer that may not be safe

Household electrical appliances sold in Australia must display safety information and compliancy markings. Hair dryers must show:

  • the manufacturer or vendor name and model or reference number on the product (AS/NZS 60335.1 clause 7.1)
  • 补听 (RCM) (AS/NZS 60335.2.23 clause 7.301)
  • a risk of electrocution tag on the power lead (AS/NZS 60335.2.23 clause 7.301).

Safety tips for using a hair dryer

Hair dryers are one of the most common household items associated with electric shock, so it’s vital that we’re using them safely to prevent injury to ourselves and others.

  • Make sure your hair dryer is in good working order.
  • Don’t use it if the power cord is damaged.
  • Where possible, avoid using your hair dryer in wet areas.
  • If water comes in contact with your hair dryer, turn it off and unplug it immediately.
  • When disconnecting your hair dryer, turn it off first at the switch, then pull out the plug.
  • Make sure the power cord is not dangling from benches or in a child’s reach.
The dryer on the left has the required compliance markings, while the one on the right does not.

Should you buy a cheap hair dryer online?

There’s no shortage of overseas retailers selling inexpensive hair dryers online but the deals aren’t typically worth the risk. They often come from markets where safety regulations aren’t quite as robust and may be dangerous to use.

Online retailers selling products into Australia, such as Temu, need to follow the same electrical appliance safety rules as local retailers, but they often don’t. Compliancy markers can also be faked so just because a hair dryer looks safe doesn’t mean it is.

You won’t be breaking any laws if you choose to import a hair dryer as an individual. But with so many retailers selling certified models in Australia, it’s probably not worth the risk to your safety just to save a few bucks.

Our experience with Temu

We bought a hair dryer from online retail giant Temu for our test. Upon arrival, we found that it lacked the safety certifications and Regulatory Compliance Mark (RCM). There was nothing on Temu’s website to suggest that the hair dryer was not cleared for sale and use in Australia, and we removed it from our test as a result.

An additional safety check also found that the hair dryer didn’t have any means of securing the power cable, such as a cable clamp. This is a requirement under Australian product safety standards.

The power lead clamp is missing from the bottom of this hair dryer from Temu.
The Temu hair dryer (left) is also missing the required risk of electrocution tag compared to the compliant model (right).

Can hair dryers damage your hearing?

The constant drone of a hair dryer can get pretty annoying but it’s unlikely to damage your hearing. We say ‘unlikely’ because it’s still a possibility under certain circumstances.

Most of the hair dryers in our test pump out around 85 decibels (dBA) of noise at a distance of 15cm from your head. This is right on the cusp of safe noise levels, as anything louder does . Though 85dBa can cause damage, you need to be continuously exposed for at least eight hours, which probably won’t happen (even if your hair is very, very wet).

Though uncommon, some hair dryers do cross the 95dBA threshold, which can cause some damage after . This is some pretty extensive drying time for one person, but families or carers with more than one person to look after could be exposed for damaging durations if they’re drying everyone’s hair back to back.

When to replace your hair dryer

Some hair dryers can be your trusty hair care companion for years, but it’s important to know when to give up the fight and trade your hair dryer in for a shiny new model.

Most hair dryers nowadays have an inbuilt safety switch that will automatically cut the power if the hair dryer starts to overheat. Older hair dryers might not have this safety feature.

When your hair dryer is on, it sucks in the dirt and dust floating around in the air. Over time, this filter can become clogged and dirty and unable to suck in enough clean air to run the hair dryer effectively. This can cause the hair dryer to overheat and you may even notice a burning smell 鈥 a sign that it’s time to replace your hair dryer.

If your hair dryer is blowing extremely hot air, it could be doing more harm than good 鈥 another sign it’s time for a replacement.

Disposing of your old hair dryer responsibly

If you’ve decided it’s time to replace your hair dryer for a shiny new model, be sure to consider how you get rid of your old one. Recycling electronic waste (e-waste) keeps toxic metals away from landfill and allows many materials to be reused.

Check with your local council 鈥 many offer a free e-waste disposal service. is another service that collects and recycles salon waste. Partnering salons might extend this service to clients, allowing you to bring your old hair dryer in to be recycled.

The post What to know when buying a hair dryer appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
770084 Hair-dryer-oil-claims regulatory-compliance-mark-comparison Temu-missing-power-lead-clamp Temu-missing-risk-of-electrocution-tag
Recall: Cancer Council Clear Zinc Kids SPF50+ sunscreen /health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care/skin-care-and-cosmetics/articles/recall-cancer-council-clear-zinc-kids-spf50-sunscreen Fri, 05 Dec 2025 02:12:00 +0000 /?p=851183 A sunscreen 糖心Vlog flagged as not meeting its SPF claims has been recalled due to formulation issues.

The post Recall: Cancer Council Clear Zinc Kids SPF50+ sunscreen appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
As we head into a hot summer and Australians are stocking up on sunscreen, another product from a leading brand has been recalled. 

Three batches of Cancer Council Sunscreen Clear Zinc Kids SPF50+ (110g) were recalled this week due to the potential for the product to become separated.

The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) says: 鈥淭he product may appear to have an uneven texture and visible water separating out of the product. If this happens, the ingredients are no longer properly mixed.

鈥淚f the product is separated, it will be more difficult to spread evenly on skin, and could reduce the overall performance of the product. This could affect the SPF of the sunscreen and may cause inadequate sun protection.鈥

In June, 糖心Vlog flagged this same product as one that did not meet its SPF claims in our testing. We revealed that 16 out of 20 sunscreens failed to meet their SPF claims. In our testing, the Cancer Council Sunscreen Clear Zinc Kids 50+ returned an SPF of 33 rather than 50+.

This could affect the SPF of the sunscreen and may cause inadequate sun protection

The TGA says this latest recall is unrelated to the ongoing investigation into SPF testing that it initiated after the 糖心Vlog report and which has resulted in the recall of other sunscreen products. 

In a statement on its website, the Cancer Council said: 鈥淲e have identified that three batches of one of our products, Cancer Council Clear Zinc Kids SPF50+ 110g, do not meet our quality standards and are initiating a product recall to ensure customers continue to receive the level of quality they expect from us.鈥

No other Cancer Council products have been affected.

Consumers should be able to trust the claims made by sunscreen suppliers. Particularly as we move into the hottest part of the year, it鈥檚 good to see products with issues recalled, 鈥 says Andy Kelly, director of campaigns and communication at 糖心Vlog.

Cancer Council Clear Zinc Kids Sunscreen SPF50
糖心Vlog tested the same batch of this sunscreen that has now been recalled – our results showed it didn’t meet its SPF claims.

Which products are affected?

Cancer Council Clear Zinc Kids SPF50+ 110g (AUST L: 430534, Barcode 9321299800661)

Batch 1141313 鈥 Expiry: June 2027

Batch 1143730 鈥 Expiry: August 2027

Batch 1146857 鈥 Expiry: November 2026

What should I do if I have this sunscreen?

If you have one of the above batches of the product, do not use it. Return the product to the place of purchase, or contact info@vitalitybrands.com or call 1300 364 515 to arrange the return of the product for a replacement or refund.

Other recalled sunscreens

The first sunscreen to be recalled following the independent 糖心Vlog review in June 2025 was Ultra Violette Lean Screen SPF 50+, after the product returned an SPF of 4 in our testing.

The TGA has since issued s that share the same base formulation as Ultra Violette Lean Screen.

Advice for choosing and wearing sunscreen

How do I know which sunscreens to buy?

The most important thing to remember when choosing a sunscreen is that it shouldn鈥檛 be your only line of defence against the sun. Seeking shade, wearing protective clothing, a broad-rimmed hat and sunglasses and using an SPF50 or SPF50+, broad-spectrum and water-resistant sunscreen, particularly when the UV rating is 3 and above, are all vital.听

It鈥檚 also important to ensure you鈥檙e applying enough sunscreen (you鈥檒l need 35mL or around seven teaspoons for full-body coverage) and reapplying every two hours, and immediately after swimming, sweating or towel-drying.

You can view the results of our sunscreen testing to ensure you鈥檙e buying a product that meets its SPF claims.

The post Recall: Cancer Council Clear Zinc Kids SPF50+ sunscreen appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
851183 a tube of cancer council clear zinc kids sunscreen spf50+ 110g
TGA acts following 糖心Vlog sunscreen investigation /health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care/skin-care-and-cosmetics/articles/tga-acts-following-choice-sunscreen-investigation Mon, 29 Sep 2025 14:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/post/tga-acts-following-choice-sunscreen-investigation/ The Therapeutic Goods Administration has raised concerns over 20 sunscreens sold in Australia.

The post TGA acts following 糖心Vlog sunscreen investigation appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
The fallout from 糖心Vlog’s sunscreen testing continues.

After 糖心Vlog testing in June revealed that 16 out of 20 sunscreens failed to meet their SPF claims, Ultra Violette voluntarily removed the worst offender 鈥 the Ultra Violette Lean Screen product 鈥 from shelves.

In the wake of that removal, several other sunscreens, thought to be based on a similar formula, were quietly removed from sale.

Now the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is taking action.

On Tuesday, 30 September, the TGA is now suggesting consumers find alternatives to the 21 sunscreen products identified as sharing the same base formulation as Ultra Violette’s Lean Screen.

That list includes:

  • Aspect Sun SPF50+ Physical Sun Protection
  • Aspect Sun SPF50+ Tinted Physical Sun Protection
  • Aesthetics Rx Ultra Protection Sunscreen Cream
  • New Day Skin Good Vibes Sunscreen SPF50+
  • New Day Skin Happy Days Sunscreen SPF50+
  • Allganics Light Sunscreen SPF50+
  • Beauti-FLTR Lustre Mineral SPF50+
  • Found My Skin SPF 50+ Tinted Face/Body Cream
  • Ethical Zinc Daily Wear Light Sunscreen
  • Ethical Zinc Daily Wear Tinted Facial Sunscreen (Dark)
  • Ethical Zinc Daily Wear Tinted Facial Sunscreen (Light)
  • Endota Mineral Protect SPF50 Sunscreen
  • We are Feel Good Inc Mineral Sunscreen SPF50+
  • GlindaWand The Fountain of Youth Environmental Defence Cream SPF50+
  • Ultra Violette Lean Screen SPF50+
  • Ultra Violette Velvet Screen SPF50 (product export only 鈥 not available in Australia)
  • People4Ocean SPF 50+ Mineral Bioactive Shield Lightly Tinted Cream
  • MCoBeauty SPF50+ Mineral Mattifying Sunscreen
  • Naked Sundays Collagen Glow Mineral Sunscreen
  • Outside Beauty & Skincare SPF 50+ Mineral Primer
  • Salus SPF50+ Daily Facial Sunscreen Broad Spectrum

“The preliminary testing indicates that this base formulation is unlikely to have an SPF greater than 21,” said the TGA in a statement.

“Preliminary testing of specific goods manufactured using the base formulation indicates that the SPF value of the goods may, for at least some of the goods, be as low as SPF 4.”

If you purchased a product in the above list, the TGA states that “you may wish to consider using an alternative product until the TGA completes its review”.

糖心Vlog had initially tested Ultra Violette’s Lean Screen at an SPF of 4, against a claim of SPF 50+. A secondary test conducted at an alternative independent lab in Germany came back with a result of SPF 5. In response Ultra Violette did its own internal testing and ultimately removed the product from shelves.

If you purchased a product in the above list, the TGA states that ‘you may wish to consider using an alternative product’ until it completes its review

“We had multiple, independent labs conduct new tests of Lean Screen,” Ultra Violette said in a statement released in August.

To date, tests on Ultra Violette’s Lean Screen returned SPFs of 4, 10, 21, 26, 33, 60, 61 and 64.听

“That wasn’t good enough for us, and it isn’t good enough for you,” Ultra Violette said in August.

“Given this pattern of inconsistency in testing, we have decided to withdraw Lean/Velvet Screen from the market, effective immediately. Purchases of this product will be eligible for a refund and a product voucher, regardless of where it was purchased.”

Concerns over reliability of sunscreen lab

The TGA also called out Princeton Consumer Research Corp (PCR), the UK-based lab responsible for Ultra Violette’s initial testing. That lab was also used by eight products that did not meet their SPF claims in 糖心Vlog testing.

In the wake of that testing, many about PCR’s testing methodology and calculations.

“[T]he TGA has significant concerns about the reliability of SPF testing undertaken by Princeton Consumer Research Corp (PCR Corp), a testing laboratory based in the United Kingdom,” the TGA wrote in a statement.听

“The TGA is aware that many companies responsible for sunscreens manufactured using this base formulation relied on testing by PCR Corp to support their SPF claims, and that they obtained that testing before they were informed of the TGA’s concerns.

[T]he TGA has significant concerns about the reliability of SPF testing undertaken by Princeton Consumer Research Corp (PCR Corp), a testing laboratory based in the United Kingdom

TGA statement

“The TGA has now outlined its concerns with PCR Corp testing to all companies responsible for sunscreens manufactured using this base formulation. The TGA has also written to PCR Corp regarding its concerns and has not received a response.”

The TGA has notified all sunscreen manufacturers named above about the concerns with both the base formula and the testing performed by PCR.

“It’s highly concerning to see the TGA confirm that 20 sunscreens using the same base formula as Ultra Violette’s Lean Screen are unlikely to meet their SPF claims,” says 糖心Vlog CEO Ashley De Silva.

“Today’s announcement highlights, yet again, the importance of the TGA’s investigation and the need for changes to how sunscreens are regulated and tested in Australia.”

The post TGA acts following 糖心Vlog sunscreen investigation appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
767844 Sunscreen-test
Ultra Violette, Naked Sundays, Endota and other sunscreens removed from shelves /health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care/skin-care-and-cosmetics/articles/ultra-violette-removed-from-shelves Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/post/ultra-violette-removed-from-shelves/ Ultra Violette, Naked Sundays, Endota and other sunscreens recalled or paused from sale following 糖心Vlog testing.听

The post Ultra Violette, Naked Sundays, Endota and other sunscreens removed from shelves appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
UPDATE 30 September: The Therapeutic Goods Administration acts, raising concerns over 20 sunscreens sold in Australia.听

UPDATE 26 September: Two more brands have recalled sunscreens following 糖心Vlog testing. The products that have been recalled are: Aspect Sun Physical Sun Protection SPF50+, Aspect Sun Tinted Physical SPF50+ and Aesthetic RX Ultra-Protection Sunscreen Cream SPF50+.

UPDATE 27 August: More brands have paused the sale of their sunscreens while they undertake further additional independent re-testing鈥痮f the formulations. These are: Outside Beauty & Skincare Mineral Primer SPF50+, Found My Skin SPF50+ Tinted Face/Body Cream, and Endota 鈥疢ineral Protect SPF50鈥痑nd鈥疦atural Clear Zinc SPF50+.

UPDATE 25 August: Naked Sundays has temporarily paused the sale of one of its sunscreens, Naked Sundays Collagen Glow Mineral. “We’ve paused the mineral from sale in Australia out of precaution, while we await new, complete independent SPF results, and subsequent guidance from the TGA on their investigation into SPF testing,” they said in a statement.

In June this year, 糖心Vlog released results revealing that 16 out of 20 sunscreens we tested failed to meet their SPF claims. In that test, one product 鈥 the Ultra Violette Lean Screen SPF 50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen 鈥 returned an SPF of 4.听

Now, after an internal investigation, Ultra Violette has confirmed it is removing the Ultra Violette Lean Screen product from shelves.

“We had multiple, independent labs conduct new tests of Lean Screen,” Ultra Violette said in a statement.听

“This week, we received results from those tests that demonstrated significant and, candidly, atypical variability. Across eight different tests, Lean Screen has now returned SPF data of 4, 10, 21, 26, 33, 60, 61, and 64. That wasn’t good enough for us, and it isn’t good enough for you.

“Given this pattern of inconsistency in testing, we have decided to withdraw Lean/Velvet Screen from the market, effective immediately. Purchases of this product will be eligible for a refund and a product voucher, regardless of where it was purchased.”

Find out more about .

Rigorous testing by 糖心Vlog found concerning results

The Ultra Violette failure was the most significant in 糖心Vlog’s sunscreen testing.听

Despite the rigorous testing we had already conducted on this sunscreen in March, we were so concerned by the results we decided to delay publishing and test another batch of the Ultra Violette sunscreen at a completely different specialised lab in Germany in May to confirm the results.听

Those results came back with a reported SPF of 5, almost identical to our initial test.听

Ultra Violette had initially suggested a mix-up was responsible for the SPF results, claiming the result was “scientifically impossible”. Later, in a video posted to its social media channels, Ultra Violette suggested issues with how the product was decanted were potentially to blame.

Ultra Violette had initially suggested a mix-up was responsible for the SPF results, claiming the result was ‘scientifically impossible’

糖心Vlog tested at a specialised Sydney-based lab, Eurofins Dermatest, using a 10-person panel, in accordance with the Australian/New Zealand Sunscreen Standard. We retested at the Normec Schrader Institute, another accredited, specialised lab in Germany. 糖心Vlog stands by its rigorous testing.

Ultra Violette initially claimed its Lean Screen product had an SPF of 64.3, based on results from testing performed at .听

Ultra Violette: “Deeply sorry”

“We are deeply sorry that one of our products has fallen short of the standards we pride ourselves on and that you have come to expect of us,” said Ultra Violette. It also stated that additional testing “reinforced” its confidence in the rest of its sunscreen line.

It remains important to clarify: any sunscreen is always better than no sunscreen, but if consumers are being misled about the quality and longevity of their sunscreen protection, that represents a genuine health concern and a huge breach of consumer trust.

Without 糖心Vlog’s investigation, Ultra Violette’s Lean Screen would still be on shelves, despite the fact that it does not provide anywhere near the amount of sun protection it claims to

Ashley de Silva, 糖心Vlog CEO

“At 糖心Vlog, our mission is to work for fair, safe, and just markets for Australian consumers,” says 糖心Vlog CEO Ashley de Silva.听

“When we released our sunscreen test results earlier this year, we did so in the interest of the public. In a country where two in three people will be diagnosed with skin cancer, people deserve to trust that the SPF ratings on sunscreen are accurate and reliable.

“Today’s announcement from Ultra Violette confirms there is a clear problem with how sunscreen is regulated and tested in Australia. Without 糖心Vlog’s investigation, Ultra Violette’s Lean Screen would still be on shelves, despite the fact that it does not provide anywhere near the amount of sun protection it claims to.听

“糖心Vlog is calling on the TGA to urgently provide an update on its investigation. Ultra Violette’s product may not be the only product that is affected and consumers deserve to know whether they can continue to trust SPF claims in Australia.”

The post Ultra Violette, Naked Sundays, Endota and other sunscreens removed from shelves appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
768687
We tested the SPF claims of 20 sunscreens. 16 failed /health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care/skin-care-and-cosmetics/articles/sunscreen-test Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/post/sunscreen-test/ UPDATE: Sunscreens from Cancer Council, Ultra Violette and other brands officially recalled.

The post We tested the SPF claims of 20 sunscreens. 16 failed appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>

Need to know

  • We tested 20 popular sunscreens on the market. 16 of them failed to meet their SPF claims
  • We’re calling on the TGA and the ACCC to investigate sunscreen brands across Australia, to make sure sunscreen safety matches people’s expectations
  • After an internal investigation, Ultra Violette is removing its Lean Screen product from the marketplace. Other brands have now paused sale of their sunscreens to undertake new testing and three other products have been recalled. 

UPDATE 4 December, 2025: Another sunscreen that didn't meet its claimed SPF in our testing, Cancer Council Clear Zinc Kids SPF50+ 110g, is recalled. 

UPDATE 30 September, 2025: The Therapeutic Goods Administration acts, raising concerns over 20 sunscreens sold in Australia.听

UPDATE 26 September, 2025: More brands recall sunscreens or pause sale of sunscreens to undertake independent re-testing鈥.

UPDATE 25 August, 2025: Naked Sundays has temporarily paused the sale of one of its sunscreens, Naked Sundays Collagen Glow Mineral. "We've paused the mineral from sale in Australia out of precaution, while we await new, complete independent SPF results, and subsequent guidance from the TGA on their investigation into SPF testing," they said in a statement.

UPDATE 22 August, 2025: As a result of 糖心Vlog's testing, Ultra Violette has decided to remove its Lean Screen product from shelves.

"We had multiple, independent labs conduct new tests of Lean Screen," said Ultra Violette, in a statement.

"This week, we received results from those tests that demonstrated significant and, candidly, atypical variability. Across eight different tests, Lean Screen has now returned SPF data of 4, 10, 21, 26, 33, 60, 61, and 64. That wasn't good enough for us, and it isn't good enough for you.

"Given this pattern of inconsistency in testing, we have decided to withdraw Lean/Velvet Screen from the market, effective immediately. Purchases of this product will be eligible for a refund and a product voucher, regardless of where it was purchased.

"We are deeply sorry that one of our products has fallen short of the standards we pride ourselves on and that you have come to expect of us."

Seek a refund from Ultra Violette.

If you live in Australia, you’ll most likely have had a long and fruitful relationship with sunscreen.

Beaches, swimming pools, long Saturdays spent on the cricket field 鈥 if you spend time partaking in these very Australian activities, sunscreen is important, vital even 鈥 it’s baked into our national consciousness.

And for good reason. According to statistics, two out of three Australians will be diagnosed with some form of skin cancer during their lifetime. That’s a staggering number.

Our first form of defence is sunscreen and that’s why we decided to test them.

糖心Vlog has tested 20 popular sunscreens, from a range of widely available and commonly purchased brands at different price points, to see whether the sun protection factor (SPF) claims made on each product are valid.

Now the results are in: 16 of the 20 sunscreens we tested failed to match their stated claims. 

How we tested sunscreens

While 糖心Vlog does a lot of product testing in-house, we sent these sunscreens to an external laboratory that has specialist expertise and equipment for SPF testing, and is approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

SPF testing sets out to determine if manufacturers are meeting their SPF claims, using the Australian/New Zealand Sunscreen Standard (AS/NZS 2604:2021), which refers to the International Standards (ISO 24444 and 24443).

To determine which sunscreens meet their SPF claims, the tests took a panel of ten adult volunteers through a very specific process using each of the 20 sunscreens.

The first step is to investigate how much UV exposure causes redness to appear on a person’s unprotected skin. 

Once that’s been established, we apply a specific amount of sunscreen to a specific area of skin. 

Next, we take a calibrated ‘solar simulator’ 鈥 specifically designed to imitate the spectrum of sunlight 鈥 and apply incremental doses of light to both protected and unprotected areas of the volunteers’ skin. 

Results on both areas are recorded and compared. A control sunscreen with a known SPF is also applied to help validate the results.

糖心Vlog experts then used these results to create a score, relative to how close the sunscreen comes to hitting its SPF claims. 

For a more detailed look at our testing methods, read聽how we test sunscreens.听

How SPF works

The goal of our testing was simple: check that sunscreens are matching their SPF claims. So let’s take a second to briefly explain what SPF is and what we’re testing.

No sunscreen is ever 100% effective at blocking all UV radiation; it’s important to state that from the outset. Sunscreen is not a shield. Even sunscreen that effectively protects at SPF 50 allows 2% of UV rays to penetrate your skin.

SPF is a measure of how effective sunscreen is at protecting your skin from UVB rays. If it takes five minutes of sun exposure for your skin to start burning, applying an SPF 50 sunscreen protects you for 50 times that amount of time 鈥 in this case 250 minutes. Sunscreen with an SPF of 30 would protect you 鈥 ideally 鈥 for 150 minutes. 

We believe Australians should be able to expect that SPF 50-rated sunscreen will provide that level of protection

In percentage figures that means the difference between, say, an SPF 50 sunscreen and an SPF 30 sunscreen is less impactful than you might assume. An SPF of 50 protects you from all but 1/50th of UV rays (98%), while sunscreen with an SPF of 30 protects you from all but 1/30th of UV rays (96.7%).

Regardless, we believe Australians should be able to expect that SPF 50-rated sunscreen will provide that level of protection. Unfortunately, in the batch we tested, this was not the case.

Results of 糖心Vlog sunscreen testing

Of the 20 sunscreens we tested, only four managed to match their SPF claims. Sixteen of the 20 sunscreens we tested failed. 

Those failures ranged from a claimed SPF 50+ that actually tested at an SPF of just four, all the way through to results in the 20s, 30s and 40s.

Sunscreens that passed the SPF test

  • Cancer Council Kids Sunscreen SPF 50+ passed with a reported SPF of 52
  • La Roche-Posay Anthelios Wet Skin Sunscreen 50+ passed with a reported SPF of 72
  • Mecca Cosmetica To Save Body SPF 50+ Hydrating Sunscreen passed with a reported SPF of 51
  • Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Body Lotion SPF 50 passed with a reported SPF of 56

Sunscreens that failed the SPF test

The most significant failure of the 20 products we tested was Ultra Violette Lean Screen SPF 50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen, which returned an SPF of 4. 

Despite doing rigorous testing of this sunscreen the first time, we were so perturbed by the results that we decided to delay publishing and test a different batch of the Ultra Violette sunscreen at a completely different lab in Germany to confirm the results. 

Those results came back with a reported SPF of 5, almost identical to our initial test. 

In addition to this failure, plenty of sunscreens with an advertised SPF of 50 or 50+ returned lower SPF results.

SPF results in the 20s
  • Aldi Ombra 50+ 鈥 tested at 26
  • Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ 鈥 tested at 28
  • Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Zinc Mineral Body Lotion 鈥 tested at 26
  • Cancer Council Everyday Value Sunscreen 50 鈥 tested at 27
  • Cancer Council Ultra Sunscreen 50+ 鈥 tested at 24
  • Neutrogena Sheer Zinc Dry-Touch Lotion SPF 50 鈥 tested at 24
  • Woolworths Sunscreen Everyday Tube SPF 50+ 鈥 tested at 27
SPF results in the 30s
  • Banana Boat Sport Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ 鈥 tested at 35
  • Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Fragrance Free Sunscreen 鈥 tested at 32
  • Cancer Council Kids Clear Zinc 50+ 鈥 tested at 33
  • Invisible Zinc Face + Body Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50 鈥 tested at 38
SPF results in the 40s
  • Coles SPF 50+ Sunscreen Ultra Tube 鈥 tested at 43
  • Nivea Sun Kids Ultra Protect and Play Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ 鈥 tested at 41
  • Nivea Sun Protect and Moisture Lock SPF 50+ Sunscreen 鈥 tested at 40
  • Sun Bum Premium Moisturising Sunscreen Lotion 50+ 鈥 tested at 40

Manufacturers stand by their claims

After testing, we contacted the manufacturers of the sunscreens we tested with our results. 

Some manufacturers disputed our findings, producing test certificates showing that their product met the claimed SPF using the same test method, which is outlined in the Australian standard. 

We also used an accredited lab for our testing and stand by our results.

Some manufacturers disputed our findings, producing test certificates showing that their product met the claimed SPF using the same test method

Ultra Violette initially suggested “human error” or a “mix-up of samples” was a “highly probable scenario”. The manufacturer also said that, given the levels of zinc oxide in its Lean Screen sunscreen, an SPF of 4 was scientifically impossible. 

After receiving this response, 糖心Vlog sent a new sample of Ultra Violette Lean Screen to a different lab for retesting, which returned an SPF of 5.

“We are deeply committed to the health and safety of our customers, rigorously retesting our entire SPF range every two years,” said Ultra Violette, in a statement sent to 糖心Vlog. 

“Lean Screen has been on the market for five years in 29 countries and we have not received a single substantiated claim of sunburn during use 鈥 reinforcing our confidence in the testing we have. If the 糖心Vlog results were at all feasible, we would have had hundreds of cases of reported sunburn and skin damage while using this product in real life situations.”

But on August 22, after an internal investigation, Ultra Violette announced it was removing the Lean Screen product from shelves. Across eight different tests, the sunscreen returned SPF data of 4, 10, 21, 26, 33, 60, 61, and 64.

“Given this pattern of inconsistency in testing,” said Ultra Violette, “we have decided to withdraw Lean/Velvet Screen from the market, effective immediately. Purchases of this product will be eligible for a refund and a product voucher, regardless of where it was purchased.”

We are deeply sorry that one of our products has fallen short of the standards we pride ourselves on and that you have come to expect of us.”

You can read the responses from all the sunscreen manufacturers, at the end of this article.  

We tested 20 sunscreens in a specialised lab to see if they met their SPF claims. Only four did.

Cheap vs expensive sunscreens

Our sunscreen testing, much like other testing organised by 糖心Vlog, shows little correlation between price and effectiveness. 

On the whole, however, three of the four sunscreens that passed our testing were on the expensive side. 

  • La Roche-Posay Anthelios Wet Skin Sunscreen 50+ passed at $8.04 per dose
  • Mecca Cosmetica To Save Body SPF 50+ Hydrating Sunscreen passed at $7.35 per dose
  • Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Body Lotion SPF 50 passed at $8.24 per dose

The fourth sunscreen that passed our test was the Cancer Council Kids Sunscreen SPF 50+ , which is cheaper than those above, at $4.93 per dose.

Why you should keep using sunscreen

What does this mean for your sunscreen use? First and foremost this testing does not mean sunscreen doesn’t work. 

It does not mean that wearing sunscreen is a waste of time, regardless of how the brands tested. 

While some specific sunscreens did not meet their claimed SPF, any sunscreen is better than none.

Please continue to wear sunscreen. Sunscreen saves lives. A sunscreen with an SPF of 30 or even 20 still offers a significant amount of sun protection. Australians should make a daily habit of wearing sunscreen and reapplying regularly, particularly if you’re swimming.

While some specific sunscreens did not meet their claimed SPF, any sunscreen is better than none

But, once again, sunscreen isn’t a shield. Even SPF 50+ sunscreens let UV rays through, so we’d like to use this opportunity to recommend all the usual advice: wear a hat, stay in the shade, wear sunglasses. Don’t stay in the direct sunlight for sustained amounts of time, apply and reapply sunscreen, and get regular skin check-ups.

All of this will help you avoid skin damage and help prevent skin cancer. 

If you are using one of these sunscreens in our testing, you should continue to do so. Don’t throw out what you have, just be sure to apply it regularly and extensively. 

糖心Vlog results reported to TGA and ACCC

In Australia, sunscreens are considered to be therapeutic goods and are regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) to ensure their safety, quality and efficacy. The majority are listed medicines with an ‘AUST L’ identification number.

All sunscreens must adhere to the AS/NZS 2604:2021 standard and have to be approved by the TGA.

However, rather than conduct compliance testing on sunscreens themselves, the TGA relies purely on reports supplied by manufacturers, delivered from accredited laboratories. 

糖心Vlog has informed both the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and the ACCC of the results of our testing. Due to the inconsistencies we have found between the SPF claims of a sample of Australian sunscreens and their actual SPFs, 糖心Vlog is calling on the TGA to conduct their own compliance testing, using current standards, rather than relying purely on reports from manufacturers. 

We believe the TGA should invest in its own compliance testing instead of simply relying on reports provided by manufacturers, and the ACCC should investigate if consumers are being misled

We believe the TGA should invest in its own compliance testing instead of simply relying on reports provided by manufacturers, and the ACCC should investigate if consumers are being misled. 

Sunscreen is always better than no sunscreen, but if consumers are being misled about the quality and longevity of their sunscreen protection, that represents a genuine health concern and a huge breach of consumer trust.

“Sunscreens are a vital tool in the fight against skin cancer and sun damage,” says Rafi Alam, 糖心Vlog senior campaigns and policy adviser. 

“Millions of Australians rely on SPF ratings to understand the protection they’re paying for, and expect these ratings to be as accurate as possible.

“We’re calling on the TGA and ACCC to start an investigation into these sunscreen brands to ensure they are complying with the consumer laws and medical standards that keep us safe.”

Manufacturer responses

Aldi response

All ALDI sunscreen formulations have been independently laboratory tested in accordance with the appropriate Australian/New Zealand Standard to ensure they meet their labelled SPF, broad spectrum and water-resistance claims. The formulas are regularly tested on an ongoing basis to ensure they continue to meet the strict industry standards. We have requested 糖心Vlog’s test report and methodology, so we can investigate the claims further.

Banana Boat / Edgewell response

As a global expert in sun protection, Edgewell Personal Care is proud of the quality and performance of our Sun Care products. We firmly stand behind our SPF claims. All of our products are uniquely formulated for the Australian market and are tested to be fully compliant with requirements set out by the Australian/New Zealand Sunscreen Standard.

Independent test results show that these products not only meet but exceed their SPF 50+ (4 hour water resistant) claim. We have provided data tables from the SPF reports.

Sunscreens are considered to be therapeutic goods in Australia [and] are regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). All Edgewell Personal Care sunscreens meet the requirements set out by the TGA.

Bondi Sands response

At Bondi Sands, the safety and quality of our products is our highest priority, and all our products undergo rigorous testing processes to ensure they meet industry standards, including the stringent regulations set by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

As part of this commitment, all our product claims are substantiated with robust testing and evidence, including validated SPF, broad spectrum and water-resistant testing. This also applies to the Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Fragrance Free Sunscreen Lotion and Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Zinc Mineral Body Lotion, whose actual tested SPF values are 72.8 and 73.6 respectively, in accordance with the AS/NZS 2604:2021 standard. These results exceed the required SPF 50+ and are in line with the claims on packaging, as well as adhering to Therapeutic Goods Administration regulations.

We therefore do not share the assessment by Choice as it does not reflect our testing and evidence in line with the relevant regulations.

We want to reassure all of our consumers that our sunscreen delivers the expected SPF when applied as instructed on the label. We regret that the report by Choice has caused concern among our own consumers and suncare users in general.

Coles’ lab response

The manufacturer advises all of their sunscreen formulations have been independently laboratory tested in accordance with the appropriate Australian/New Zealand Standard to ensure they meet their labelled SPF, broad spectrum and water-resistance claims. The formulas are regularly tested on an ongoing basis to ensure they continue to meet the strict industry standards and legal requirements. They have requested 糖心Vlog’s test report and methodology, so the claims can be investigated further.

Invisible Zinc 鈥 Inova response

We take our commitment to sun safety extremely seriously and pride ourselves on the quality and the safety of the products that are available in the market under the Invisible Zinc brand (IZ).

We understand that a sample of our IZ Face + Body Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50 was purchased by Choice, and has subsequently undergone SPF testing with a test result of SPF 37.8.

This result [is] very surprising as it does not match the SPF testing results undertaken by the company. As an immediate action we have requested the sample that was tested by Choice in order to conduct further testing, with our manufacturer, to determine what has occurred.

In-line with our commitment to transparency, we want to clarify a number of facts to give consumers comfort that, when it comes to our whole Invisible Zinc range, we are committed to ensuring compliance with all applicable regulations and industry best practice before products are released into the market:

  • Our products are made in a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility in Australia that is licensed by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and that meets strict Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards.
  • We test all of our Invisible Zinc products for SPF (and other label claims) in an accredited testing laboratory in Australia in accordance with the Australian Standards. It is a TGA requirement that sunscreens sold in Australia meet the Australian Standards.
  • Invisible Zinc Face + Body Mineral Sunscreen SPF50 was last tested against its SPF and water resistance claims in 2017 (and the formulation has not changed in the intervening period). Testing confirmed an SPF of 63.1. It is also worth noting that the SPF test results were achieved after 2 hours of water resistance testing.
  • The standard protocol for testing SPF is on 10 human subjects. While we stand by that testing methodology, human skin can obviously be highly variable in different subjects and that can therefore lead to some variability in test results.
  • Every batch goes through stringent quality control testing before it is released for sale to confirm that it has been manufactured to the same formulation that has gone through SPF testing.

Neutrogena / Kenvue response

We stand confidently by the label claim of SPF50 on Neutrogena庐 Sheer Zinc鈩 Dry Touch Lotion 88ML. Every product in our Neutrogena庐 sunscreen range sold in Australia complies with all relevant Australian standards and regulatory requirements.

Nivea / Biersdorf response

We want to assure consumers that all NIVEA Sun products are registered with the TGA and meet the Australian Standard AS/NZS2604:2012, the currently relevant Standard for existing products. Our NIVEA Sun products have been tested for SPF efficacy and as a result all SPF sun protection claims made on the products have been validated. 

Sun Bum response

Despite the testing conducted by 糖心Vlog claiming otherwise, our laboratories are confident that the SPF50+ product meets the label claim of its SPF rating based on the following: 

  1. Sunscreen production and sale in Australia is heavily regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (“TGA”), the Australian government body responsible for ensuring the quality of therapeutic products, noting that sunscreen is regarded as a therapeutic product, a standard much higher than other countries that regard sunscreen as a cosmetic product; 
  2. It is widely acknowledged that the current testing standards AS/NZ as well as the equivalent ISO standards are inherently subjective, meaning that different results may be obtained each time a test is conducted; 
  3. It is also acknowledged within the Australian Regulatory guidelines for sunscreen, that subsequent retesting of a sunscreen is likely to yield a mean SPF anywhere within the 95% Confidence Interval (CI) from the original testing of the product or even a few SPF units beyond either end of that 95% CI. If the original test result is close to the lower limit for a particular SPF claim allowed by the Australian Sunscreen Standard, the retest result could be lower than that lower limit and appear to cast doubt on the validity of the labelled SPF claim. However, it would be necessary to retest the product several times and obtain consistently low mean results before any conclusion could be drawn about the labelled SPF being unjustified. 
  4. There have been no consumer complaints in respect of this product in relation to sunburn, an indicator of low SPF; and 
  5. Testing of the UV filters included in the tested products indicate the acceptable efficacy of the materials used and were within the permitted ingredients percentage in accordance with the TGA requirements. 

Ultra Violette response

At Ultra Violette we take the quality of our products incredibly seriously. We only work with reputable, TGA licensed manufacturers who perform substantial quality release testing in accordance with the strictest SPF standards in the world. Given our commitment to producing the highest quality sunscreens for consumers, we do not accept these results as even remotely accurate. It is essential to also note here that the TGA, not Choice Magazine, are the recognised authority governing sunscreens in Australia.

Lean Screen is not identified in any supporting documentation from the Choice test, therefore there is no guarantee that these test results are indeed reflective of this product. Due to the blind nature of this test, human error and the mix up of samples is a highly probable scenario. There is also the question as to whether the product was appropriately decanted and labelled correctly for this blind testing 鈥 as stated in the ARTG guidelines 鈥 and in a GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) facility.

Lean Screen contains 22.75% zinc oxide, a level at which, when applied sufficiently, would render a testing result of SPF 4 scientifically impossible. We have a Certificate of Analysis to prove the zinc in this batch was in specification, so this was not a manufacturing issue. 

Ultra Violette most recently completed testing for Lean Screen in 2021 (with results of SPF of 64.32 to allow for an SPF 50+ rating) as required to support our listing on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG), and again in 2024 in accordance with the FDA standard revealing consistent results for UVB. Additionally, we performed a separate UVA test and received a PA ++++ rating (the highest possible score for UVA protection). However, to ensure complete transparency and peace of mind for our customers, we have proactively initiated an urgent SPF test of the batch in question. Should there be any chance our product is not delivering on the claims we have made around SPF protection, we would address this as a matter of urgency. 

It is disappointing that Choice has chosen to release what we view as misleading information without waiting for this critical verification, further demonstrating their interest in generating headlines – and not in the wellbeing of the general public. 

Reproducibility of results is a key element to scientific truth. One single blind test is not substantial in comparison to extensive rounds of testing with supporting documentation.  

We are deeply committed to the health and safety of our customers, rigorously retesting our entire SPF range every two years. Lean Screen has been on the market for 5 years in 29 countries and we have not received a single substantiated claim of sunburn during use 鈥 reinforcing our confidence in the testing we have. If the Choice results were at all feasible, we would have had hundreds of cases of reported sunburn and skin damage while using this product in real life situations.

At Ultra Violette we take misleading claims made about our products very seriously. As a suncare brand founded in Australia, the country with the highest skin cancer rates in the world, we are too familiar with the fearmongering that exists in this category. We find this study counterintuitive and not at all in the best interest of consumers. We believe consumers deserve the correct and most credible information to stay safe and informed when it comes to sun protection. Our priority as always remains the health and trust of our customers. 

Woolworths response

Woolworths has reviewed our records and concluded that Woolworths Everyday Sunscreen SPF 50+ 100ML, meets the label claim of its SPF rating.

Testing by Princeton Consumer Research, USA, using ISO 24444:2019 and ISO 16217:2020 as required by the Sunscreen products standard, showed an average SPF of 68.0, confirming an SPF 50+ rating. Water resistance testing showed an SPF of 60.7. 

For the batch R454, which was tested by Choice, we have confirmed the positive batch release with our sponsor. Result for the assay tests for each of the active ingredients meets the specification of the product as per TGA requirement. All Woolworths sunscreen products are manufactured and tested as per the stringent TGA requirements and all batches undergo a strict batch release process.

The post We tested the SPF claims of 20 sunscreens. 16 failed appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
767534 We tested the SPF claims of 20 sunscreens. 16 failed One SPF 50+ sunscreen came in with a result of 4. sunscreens-group-photo
How we test sunscreen /health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care/skin-care-and-cosmetics/articles/how-we-test-sunscreen Sun, 15 Jun 2025 14:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/post/how-we-test-sunscreen/ We stand by our rigorous, independent testing that reveals which sunscreens meet their SPF claims.听

The post How we test sunscreen appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
Sunscreen plays an essential role in protecting our skin from the harmful effects of the sun. With so many brands and options available, choosing the right sunscreen can be an overwhelming process.

On this page:

We wanted to know if sunscreens live up to their SPF (sun protection factor) claims, so we put a range of products to the test to help Australians make an informed decision when shopping for sunscreen.

Where the sunscreens were tested

While we do a lot of product testing in-house, we sent 20 sunscreens to an external laboratory, Sydney-based Eurofins Dermatest, which is accredited to test sunscreens in line with the Australian/New Zealand Sunscreen Standard, as specified by the requirements of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

This lab has specialist expertise and equipment for SPF testing, so we can determine which sunscreens meet their claims and will work best at protecting you in the sun.

After the Ultra Violette product returned an SPF of 4 when tested at the Sydney lab, we sent a different batch of this product to an accredited, specialised laboratory in Germany, the Normec Schrader Institute, for a validation test. The validation test returned an SPF of 5.

How we choose which sunscreens to test

While we’d love to test every sunscreen on the market, we had to narrow down our selection for testing.

Using retail data and our expertise in buying behaviour and consumer trends, we honed in on a selection of sunscreens that included some of the most widely available and commonly bought sunscreens in Australia, as well as brands that are popular with various demographics. We included a range of price points and brands available in the major retailers and through specialist retailers or online.

Another consideration was to include a mix of chemical and mineral sunscreens, as well as products marketed specifically as being suitable for kids.

Based on this information, we put together a final list for our buyers, who headed out to the shops (or online) to buy each product in the same way a regular consumer would. We do this so we can be sure the products we’re testing are the same as products that Australians are buying from supermarket shelves and other retailers.听

We also ensured we were buying sunscreens with similar expiration dates, in order to give the fairest results possible.

The sunscreens that were selected for testing.

How we test sunscreens

SPF testing sets out to determine if manufacturers are meeting their SPF claims, using the Australian/New Zealand Sunscreen Standard (AS/NZS 2604:2021), which refers to the International Standards (ISO 24444:2019 and 24443:2021).听

All 20 sunscreens initially underwent a five-person panel test in an accredited laboratory in Australia as specified by the standard, and then 18 of those sunscreens (every product except the two that returned the highest results, the La Roche-Posay and Neutrogena products) underwent another five-person panel test.听

Overall, 18 of the sunscreens underwent a 10-person panel test. The product sent to Germany had a third round of testing on another five-person panel.听

We used the same process that manufacturers use to test their products. In our test, however, products underwent blind testing, a standard method used to minimise bias and improve validity in scientific research. To facilitate blind testing, all 20 sunscreen products were decanted into amber glass jars, sealed, labelled and transported in accordance with strict instructions provided by Eurofins Dermatest, the accredited and specialised laboratory 糖心Vlog used for testing. Amber glass jars were used in order to limit any degradation of the sunscreen ingredients and ensure the validity of our results, as they block UV light more than clear glass jars, and glass is less reactive than plastic. The entire process, including transportation to the Sydney-based Eurofins Dermatest, was undertaken within an hour. The product sent to Germany was also decanted into an amber glass jar, sealed, labelled and transported according to strict instructions provided to 糖心Vlog by sunscreen experts at the Normec Schrader Institute.

There are three steps to the tightly controlled and consistent process: product application, solar simulation and reading of results.

1. Product application

A very precise measurement (2 milligrams of sunscreen per centimetre square of skin) of the product is applied to a marked out area of the skin. This is the recommended amount of sunscreen people should be using as part of adequate everyday use. The product is evenly spread using a standardised technique and then left to dry for 15 to 30 minutes.听

The panel of volunteers used to test the sunscreens must have skin types that show sun-burning reactions and not have any sensitivities to the products’ ingredients.

2. Solar simulation

The lab uses a calibrated solar simulator that has been specifically designed to imitate the spectrum of sunlight. Small incremental doses of light are applied to the area protected by the tested sunscreen, as well as to an area protected by a control sunscreen with a known SPF, and to an unprotected area. Overnight, a slight sunburn will develop in test areas.

3. Reading of results

Around 24 hours after exposure, the results are recorded. The lab determines how much UV exposure (in seconds) is needed for someone to start burning without sunscreen. It then determines how much exposure is needed with the sunscreen test sample applied. The factor between the two is the sun protection factor (SPF). A control sunscreen is used on each test subject to validate results.

Note that we did not test these sunscreens for their water resistance.

Why are sunscreen testing results variable?

Different labs can get a variation of SPF results for the same sunscreen. 糖心Vlog isn’t the first consumer organisation to find that our sunscreen test results differ from those achieved by manufacturers, despite the fact that labs are supposedly testing to the same standard.

To account for the variability that can occur when testing sunscreens, 糖心Vlog has applied a 20% allowance when assessing the test results for sunscreens. This means that if a sunscreen returned an SPF that was within 20% of the SPF result required by the TGA, we assessed it as meeting its SPF claims.听

It’s worth noting that even with this 20% allowance, 16 of 20 sunscreens still didn’t meet their claims 鈥 highlighting there may be a systemic problem in the Australian sunscreen market.

Our findings and the potential public health implications warrant further investigation by the TGA through a compliance review. We are asking the TGA to independently test the mean SPF of at least the sunscreens that failed our commissioned tests. In the circumstances, we do not consider it acceptable to rely on test results provided by suppliers.

Sunscreen testing is costly. 糖心Vlog 鈥 an independent, member-funded non-profit 鈥 funded this work entirely ourselves due to its importance for consumers. We believe consumers should be able to trust what is written on sunscreen packaging. This is why we want to see the TGA do its own testing.

Scoring criteria explained

The 糖心Vlog Expert Rating reflects the ratio between the measured SPF of a sunscreen and its label claim, expressed as a percentage.

We recommend sunscreens with a 糖心Vlog Expert Rating of at least 80%. This means the product receives a ‘pass’ result in the SPF rating test. A score of 100% means the product meets its claimed SPF.

The post How we test sunscreen appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
764209 sunscreens-group-photo
How to buy and use sunscreen /health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care/skin-care-and-cosmetics/buying-guides/sunscreen Thu, 12 Jun 2025 02:50:00 +0000 /uncategorized/post/sunscreen/ What you need to know about sunscreen, plus tips to help you get the most effective UV protection.

The post How to buy and use sunscreen appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
Australia has one of the highest skin cancer rates in the world. Sunscreen plays an important role in protecting not only against skin cancer, but also sunburn and premature ageing.听

On this page:

However, sunscreen is just one part of the equation. Other protective measures such as wearing protective clothing, a hat, sunglasses and avoiding the sun in the middle of the day all play their part in keeping your skin healthy and safe.

Sunscreen plays an important role in protecting not only against skin cancer, but also sunburn and premature ageing

Melanoma Institute Australia says regular use of sunscreen can reduce melanoma risk by 40%, but when sunscreen isn’t used properly 鈥 which usually means not using enough of it, or not reapplying often enough 鈥 people may not be getting the protection they expect.

With so many products on the market, choosing the right sunscreen can be overwhelming. Here we’ll take you through what you need to know about sunscreen, and what to look for when choosing one.

What is sunscreen?

Sunscreen, also known as sunblock or sun cream, comes in various applications but is usually a cream or lotion. It’s applied to exposed areas of the skin to help protect it from the harmful effects of the sun.

All sunscreens sold in Australia are regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

UV rays explained

When you’re out in the sun, you’re exposed to two forms of ultraviolet (UV) radiation: UVA and UVB. This exposure to UV radiation is the main cause of melanoma and other skin cancers.听

A broad-spectrum sunscreen blocks both UVA and UVB rays. All sunscreens over SPF4 are required to be broad spectrum.

UVA

UVA penetrates deeply into the skin and is responsible for tanning. It also causes skin ageing, wrinkles and leathering (think “A” for ageing). It makes UVB-induced damage worse and increases your risk of developing some skin cancers. UVA penetrates clouds and car windows and is present at fairly consistent levels during daylight hours all year round.

UVB

UVB radiation penetrates the top layer of the skin and is the main cause of skin reddening and sunburn (think “B” for burns). It’s also the major cause of skin cancer and can contribute to tanning and skin ageing. UVB is also responsible for making vitamin D in our skin 鈥 for most people, incidental sun exposure is all you’ll need to get enough vitamin D.

UV levels

UV radiation levels vary based on a number of factors including:

  • time of day
  • season of year
  • latitude (the closer to the equator, the higher the UV)
  • altitude (the higher the altitude, the higher the UV)
  • cloud cover
  • reflective surfaces (e.g. water, sand and snow).

The UV index is a useful tool that is constantly measured and updated daily by the to educate you about UV levels so you know when you need to take sun safety precautions.

There are five levels to the UV index:

  • Low (1鈥2)
  • Moderate (3鈥5)
  • High (6鈥7)
  • Very high (8鈥10)
  • Extreme (11 and above)

Sunscreen is a vital part of sun safety and the Australian Bureau of Meteorology says sun protection measures are recommended when the UV is 3 and above. Handy apps for UV index include the and the Cancer Council’s free SunSmart app.

Sunscreen and SPF

When buying a bottle of sunscreen, you’ll find SPF with a number beside it on the label. We’ve been trained to aim for the highest SPF number, but what does it actually mean?

SPF (or sun protection factor) is a measure of how well a sunscreen protects you from sunburn. The number indicates how much longer it takes untanned skin to start to redden with sunscreen applied compared to how long it takes to start to redden without sunscreen.

How SPF is tested

The SPF rating is determined through laboratory testing on human volunteers.听

Untanned skin is exposed to simulated UV light, with and without sunscreen applied. Testers measure how long it takes for the skin to redden. For example, if it takes 300 seconds for skin to burn with sunscreen, and 10 seconds for skin to burn without sunscreen, 300 is divided by 10 to give an SPF rating of 30.听

Therefore, you’d expect a sunscreen with an SPF 30 rating to protect you for 30 times the amount of time than if you were wearing no sunscreen.听

Currently in Australia the highest SPF rating is 50+ but to qualify for this rating under Australian regulations the sunscreen should have an SPF of 60 or more.

Does sunscreen protect from all UV radiation?

No, sunscreen does not protect you from all UV radiation. Regardless of how high the sunscreen’s SPF is, UV radiation can still penetrate through the skin.听

  • SPF 4 protects you from 75% of UV rays
  • SPF 8 protects you from 87.5% of UV rays
  • SPF 15 protects you from 93.3% of UV rays
  • SPF 30 protects you from 96.7% of UV rays
  • SPF 50 protects you from 98% of UV rays

Sunscreen is only one part of the picture when it comes to sun safety.

Physical (mineral) vs chemical sunscreen

There are two main types of sunscreens based on their active ingredients: physical sunscreen and chemical sunscreen.

Physical sunscreen

Physical sunscreen (also known as mineral sunscreen) contains zinc oxide or titanium dioxide as its active ingredients. These create a physical barrier on the skin to deflect or scatter UV rays away from your skin. This type is generally recommended for people with sensitive skin.

Chemical sunscreen

Chemical sunscreen absorbs UV rays and stops it from penetrating your skin. Common active ingredients in this type of sunscreen are homosalate and octocrylene. Chemical sunscreen can cause skin irritation.

Endocrine disruptors?

There’s also concern that some chemical sunscreens are endocrine disruptors 鈥 that is, they have hormonal effects in humans. These include oxybenzone, octyl methoxycinnamate, homosalate and 4-MBC. While this activity has been shown in animals and tissue tests, the doses used in testing are vastly greater than the amount used for human sun protection.听

Sunscreens are regulated in Australia by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and their ingredients must be approved and assessed for quality and safety.

Compared to sprays, sunscreens that come as a lotion or cream can make it easier to ensure you’re applying enough.

Types of sunscreen application

There are many different ways you can apply sunscreen. The most commonly available products come in the form of lotions and creams, sprays and roll-ons.

Lotion and cream

Most sunscreens on the market come in the form of lotions and creams. These have the advantage of being cheap, easy to apply and easy to see where it’s been applied.听

They come in various degrees of thickness so they can take a while to rub in, and they may leave your skin feeling sticky or greasy.

Spray

People like sprays for being easy to apply and for generally being less greasy than creams and lotions. But with sprays it’s easy to use too little and to miss areas, and you could miss out on getting the best level of protection. You also need to be careful when spraying near the mouth and eyes to not ingest or inhale any product.听

Melanoma Institute Australia recommends only using a spray sunscreen during cooler parts of the day, being sure to apply a generous amount, saying sprays aren’t as effective at reflecting light as more physical blockers such as lotions, creams and sticks.

Roll-on

Roll-on sunscreen is small, portable and easy to apply to small areas, but difficult to apply evenly over a larger area, so it’s not ideal for full body application.

Stick

A sunscreen stick is probably only useful for small areas like the face. It’s dry and therefore mess-free (although it’s sticky when it’s on), and compact enough to keep handy in your bag.

Gel

Being water-based, gel sunscreen聽 won’t leave your skin feeling sticky or greasy, and is usually easier to rub in. People with a lot of body hair may find gel more comfortable to apply than other types of sunscreen.

Powder

Powder sunscreen is brushed on like foundation powder and is best for small areas of skin like the face. Dry and non-greasy, it could be useful over make-up or for touch-ups during the day. Just make sure you use enough.

Foam

This is a relatively new type of sunscreen that’s fast and easy to apply, and easy to visually assess coverage on the body. But聽 making sure you use enough can be tricky 鈥 a large cupped handful per section of the body (5.7鈥6g) is usually recommended, which you can achieve with about three seconds of spray.

Sunscreen with insect repellent

Products that combine sunscreen and insect repellent are generally not recommended, as requirements for the amount and frequency of application are different for each purpose. Sunscreen should be applied generously every two hours. Insect repellants should be applied more sparingly, every two to six hours depending on the concentration, and you should avoid the face.

It’s also worth noting that using a personal insect repellent containing N,N-Diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) can reduce a sunscreen’s effectiveness by about 30%.

Don’t be misled by labels that say “4 hours water resistance”. You should apply sunblock at least every two hours if you or your child have been in the water.

What to look for when buying a sunscreen

SPF

Use SPF 50+ sunscreen for maximum benefit. But effectiveness also comes down to application 鈥 an SPF 30 sunscreen that’s applied properly will work better than a SPF 50+ sunscreen that isn’t applied properly.

Broad spectrum

This provides protection against both UVA and UVB rays, which is important. While UVB is the cause of sunburn, both can contribute to an increased risk of skin cancer.

Price

All sunscreens on the market must be listed with the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and tested and rated according to Australian standard AS/NZS 2604:2021. So the cheapest 50+ sunscreen should provide you with the same protection as the most expensive.

Water resistance

If you’re going swimming, look for a product that says it’s water-resistant. Don’t be misled by labels that say “4 hours water resistance” 鈥 it may well stay on your body for this amount of time, but should be reapplied more frequently for maximum benefit. Reapply after swimming or exercise, and otherwise at least every two hours.

Products for children and sensitive skin

Some sunscreens are marketed specifically for toddlers, infants and children. These may contain more physical blockers and fewer chemical filters, and so may also be more suitable for adults with sensitive skin. Consult your dermatologist about the best options for you.

It’s best to keep babies out of the sun (where the UV index is 3 or more) as much as possible for the first 12 months. If it’s unavoidable, use a hat, clothing and shade for protection, using sunscreen as a last resort to cover any unprotected skin. Melanoma Institute Australia recommends that instead of using sunscreen, newborns should be kept in the shade until they are at least six months old.

Top tips for using sunscreen

  • Apply sunscreen to clean, dry skin 15 to 30 minutes before you go out in the sun to allow it time to interact with your skin. Then reapply it just before you go out 鈥 you’ll increase the amount applied and be more likely to get the stated SPF benefit.
  • Cover all parts of the body not protected by clothing (don’t forget your ears, the back of your neck, the backs of your hands and the tops of your feet).
  • Apply it evenly, and don’t rub it in excessively 鈥 most sunscreens will absorb into the outer layer of skin and don’t need to be rubbed in vigorously.
  • Reapply at least once every two hours, especially after swimming or exercise.
  • Think beyond the beach and pool 鈥 use sunscreen whenever you go outdoors for a significant amount of time, such as to the park, a lunchtime walk to the shops, playing sports or gardening.
  • Store your sunscreen at a temperature of less than 30掳C. If you leave it in the glovebox of your car or in the sun, it may lose its effectiveness. If you’re at the beach, keep it in the esky with the drinks, in the shade or wrapped in a towel.
  • When buying sunscreen, aim for those that have the furthest expiry date.
  • Don’t use sunscreens that have passed their expiry date as some of the active ingredients may have broken down and the sunscreen can lose its effectiveness.
  • If you’re trying a new sunscreen and have sensitive skin, do a patch test on your inner arm and leave it for 24 hours to see if there’s any reaction.
  • Sunscreen is only a secondary and partial defence. First and foremost, try to avoid the sun in the middle of the day.

Other sun safety measures

There’s no denying the importance of using sunscreen, but it’s only a partial defence against UV radiation and keeping your skin safe when you’re in the sun. When you’re spending time outdoors remember the following:

  • Slip on protective clothing.
  • Slop on SPF 50+ sunscreen that’s broad spectrum and water resistant whenever the UV index is 3 or higher.
  • Slap on a hat (ideally one that protects the face, neck and ears).
  • Seek shade (especially during times when the UV is high).
  • Slide on sunglasses.

If you’re going to be on a beach, investing in a shade or shelter is a great way to help you stay sun-safe.

Some skin cancer experts are concerned that sunscreens lull people into a false sense of security, and they’ll stay in the sun longer 鈥 a fact borne out in a number of studies 鈥 therefore exposing themselves to the potentially more damaging UV radiation.听

However, that doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t use sunscreens 鈥 only that you should be aware of its limitations, and not rely on it for complete protection.

Frequently asked questions

Can you still tan when wearing sunscreen?

Sunscreen will largely prevent tanning provided you’re using enough of it and reapplying often. However, no sunscreen blocks 100% of UV rays so if you’re not using any other sun safety measures and using sunscreen alone, tanning is still possible.

Does sunscreen expire?

Yes. Sunscreens should not be used after their expiration date. The active ingredients degrade over time and lose their effectiveness.

Should you still wear sunscreen during the cooler months or on a cloudy day?

Many skin care experts recommend sunscreen use every day.

Sunburn is caused by UV radiation, not heat, so you shouldn’t rely on the temperature of the day to determine if it’s time to wear sunscreen. UV rays can penetrate clouds and cause sun damage even on an overcast day so it’s a good idea to check the UV index daily.

Are there nanoparticles in sunscreen?

Nanoparticles have been widely used in sunscreens for many years, however, current research has found that they don’t pose a risk. Unless the skin is broken or you suffer from dermatitis, they cannot penetrate the outer layers of the skin.

The post How to buy and use sunscreen appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
770726 mother-applying-sunscreen-on-face-of-daughter-at-the-beach mother-and-son-splashing-in-pool-at-holiday-resort
8 common sunscreen myths debunked /health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care/skin-care-and-cosmetics/articles/common-sunscreen-myths-debunked Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/post/common-sunscreen-myths-debunked/ Most of us know that protecting ourselves from the sun is vital, but too many still fall for common myths about sun safety.听

The post 8 common sunscreen myths debunked appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>

Need to know

  • Despite decades of advice about how to avoid skin cancer, Australians still have some of the highest rates in the world聽
  • Misunderstandings around the meaning of SPF are still common
  • Paying more for your sunscreen doesn鈥檛 guarantee a better product

Ever since Sid the Seagull first cheerfully sang to us about the need to “Slip, slop, slap” back in 1981, Australians have been regularly reminded of the need to protect ourselves from the sun.

Despite the campaign’s catchy slogan, which in 2007 was extended to include the words seek (shade) and slide (on sunglasses), Australia still has some of the highest rates of skin cancer in the world.

We look at some of the most common myths that hamper our sun safety practices.听

Myth 1: The higher the SPF, the less often you need to apply

Are you of the belief that an SPF 50 sunscreen doesn’t need to be reapplied as often as an SPF 30?聽

If so, you’re not alone 鈥 but you’re also wrong. Our recent survey of the 糖心Vlog audience found that nearly 10% (nine in 100) believe this myth.

The sun protection factor (SPF) of your sunscreen measures how well it protects you from sunburn; the higher the number, the more protection you get.听

However, the difference between an SPF 30 and an SPF 50 probably isn’t as much as you think.听

The difference between an SPF 30 and an SPF 50 probably isn’t as much as you think

SPF 30 sunscreen filters out 96.7% of UV radiation, and SPF 50 is only marginally more effective, filtering out 98% of radiation.听

Whichever one you use, you’ll still need to reapply it every two hours, or after swimming, exercising or drying yourself off with a towel.听

You should also remember that sunscreen alone won’t protect you, and you should follow the other sun safety recommendations to reduce the risk of skin cancer.

Myth 2: Sunscreen isn’t needed on a cool or cloudy day

Cloud cover or cooler weather doesn’t mean you can abandon sun-smart behaviour. Even if it feels like the sun is less harsh on a day when it’s overcast, the UV rays can still do damage.听

The UV index measures UV levels on a scale from 0 (low) to 11+ (extreme). It’s recommended that you protect yourself once UV reaches a moderate level, which is defined as 3.听

Even on days when the UV index is low, you should still practice sun safety if you’re near reflective surfaces or outside for an extended period.听

Finding the UV index is easy: it’s reported by the Bureau of Meteorology as part of the forecast information for your location. You can also use the to get this information.

Sun protection is recommended once the UV index reaches a moderate level, which is defined as a UV index of 3.

Myth 3: Glass protects you from the sun

Many of us may believe that if we’re behind glass, such as when travelling in a car, we don’t need to practice sun safety.听

But even though untinted glass reduces UV radiation, it doesn’t block it altogether. For this reason, it’s recommended that people who spend long periods in a vehicle should still use sun protection to prevent exposure to harmful rays.

Regardless, it’s probably good practice to wear sunscreen when travelling in a car on a high UV day, particularly for children in the back seat who may open windows for fresh air.

Myth 4: People with darker skin or a tan don’t need sunscreen

It isn’t just those with pale, northern European complexions that need to protect themselves from the sun.听

While it’s true that melanin (the pigment that gives skin colour) does help absorb and distribute UV radiation, it’s not a perfect barrier, and people with darker skin will still experience damage from the sun and be susceptible to skin cancer.

And don’t think that if you don’t get sunburned you’re safe. Even if you tend to tan rather than turn red, you’re still being damaged by that sun exposure.

Myth 5: Wearing sunscreen leads to vitamin D deficiency

It’s true that the best source of vitamin D is UVB radiation 鈥 which is blocked by sunscreen. But for most people, adequate vitamin D levels are reached through incidental exposure to the sun when going about our daily activities.听

When the UV index is 3 or above, it only takes a few minutes a day outdoors on most days of the week to get enough vitamin D to stay healthy.

When the UV index is 3 or above, it only takes a few minutes a day outdoors on most days of the week to get enough vitamin D

Sensible sun protection does not increase your risk of vitamin D deficiency, but some groups 鈥 such as frail, elderly people or people who live mostly indoors 鈥 are more at risk than others.听

If you’re concerned, speak to your doctor for advice.

Myth 6: SPF 30 sunscreen blocks twice as many UV rays as SPF 15

This was by far the most commonly held misconception in our recent survey, with more than half of respondents agreeing this was true.

A sunscreen with an SPF 15 rating will protect you from about 93% of UVB rays, while an SPF 30 protects you from around 97%.听

Put another way, an SPF 30 sunscreen allows about 3% of rays through, and an SPF 15 lets through about 7%.

No sunscreen blocks 100% of the sun’s rays, which is why it’s important you follow other sun-smart strategies such as wearing protective clothing and a hat, seeking shade and using sunglasses as well as applying sunscreen.听

Myth 7: The more you pay, the better the sunscreen

As with many categories of products we test, when it comes to sunscreens price is not an indicator of performance.听

In our recent test of 20 sunscreens to see if they met their advertised SPF, the product with the poorest results 鈥 Ultra Violette Lean Screen SPF 50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen 鈥 was the most expensive, costing $52 for 75ml.听

Near the other end of the scale in terms of price and performance, the Cancer Council Kids Sunscreen SPF 50+ was one of the few brands that met its SPF claims, and it costs just $15.50 for 110ml.

Myth 8: Kids need different sunscreens than adults

While many of the sunscreens marketed for kids will feature cute and colourful designs on their packaging, there probably isn’t much else to separate these products from the adult versions.

Some may say they’re more suitable for children as they’ve been specifically formulated or tested for more sensitive or delicate skin. This may mean they’re free from fragrance, for example, and may be less likely to cause irritation.听

These are no more effective in terms of sun protection than a standard sunscreen that doesn’t have a ‘kids’ label on it

They may also be water-resistant, which is a plus for active kids, or it might be the mode of application that makes it kid-friendly 鈥 for example, a roll-on sunscreen might be easier to apply to a squirming toddler than a cream.听

However, these sunscreens are no more effective in terms of sun protection than a standard sunscreen that doesn’t have a ‘kids’ label on it.

Mineral-based sunscreens

Mineral-based sunscreens may also be labelled as suitable for children.

These are made with titanium dioxide and/or zinc oxide, and are also known as ‘physical sunscreens’, as they form a physical barrier between your skin and the sun’s rays 鈥 you can often literally see a white residue. This is in contrast to ‘chemical sunscreens’, which are absorbed into the skin to protect.听

The Melanoma Institute Australia recommends mineral sunscreens for older babies and toddlers.听

Important sun protection tips for children

Regardless of which sunscreen you use, babies and kids need protection from the sun just like adults.听

For the very young 鈥 six months and under 鈥 shade, broad-brimmed hats and protective clothing should be the priority. The Australasian College of Dermatologists does not recommend using sunscreen on infants under six months.听

For older babies and children follow the usual sun safety guidelines. If you’re worried your child’s skin may react to sunscreen, you can test it on a small area of skin before applying it more broadly.听

The post 8 common sunscreen myths debunked appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
760893 uv-index-and-sunsmart-screenshots-side-by-side
Can your sunscreen expire? /health-and-body/beauty-and-personal-care/skin-care-and-cosmetics/articles/sunscreen-expiration-date Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/post/sunscreen-expiration-date/ Here's what you need to know to make sure your sunscreen will do its job properly, whether or not it's reached its expiry date.

The post Can your sunscreen expire? appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
Sunscreen is a must-have in our sunny country, but many of us don’t give a second thought to whether we’re actually getting the protection we need from it. Once you’ve put it on, you’re all set, right?

Not quite. Aside from applying and reapplying it properly (which most people don’t do), it’s important to double-check whether it’s going to do the job you expect it to.

Instead of just grabbing that half-used tube that’s sat in your glovebox or in the bottom of your beach bag over winter, here’s how to make sure your sunscreen will still give you the protection you need.

How long does sunscreen last?

In Australia, all sunscreens are regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), and will generally last between two to three years.听

They’re also required to be labelled with an ‘expiry’ or ‘use-by’ date on the packaging, so you don’t have to remember when exactly you bought them. Although you may have to do a little searching 鈥 the expiry dates aren’t always easy to spot.

Sunscreens must have an expiry or use-by date on the packaging, but some are easier to read than others.

Sunscreen types: What to know

Before we even get started on the topic of sunscreen expiry, it’s important to understand the two different types of sunscreen.

Physical sunscreen (aka mineral sunscreen) contains mineral particles such as zinc oxide and titanium dioxide. The particles create a physical barrier to deflect and scatter UV rays away from your skin 鈥 think zinc sticks and those sunscreens that leave a white residue on your skin.

Chemical sunscreen is the type you’re probably most familiar with 鈥 it’s the creamy type that becomes mostly transparent when you rub it into your skin. It uses light-sensitive chemicals to absorb the UV rays so the rays don’t penetrate your skin.

So what does this mean in terms of your sunscreen expiring?

What happens when sunscreens expire?

Physical sunscreen

“Generally, with physical sunscreens, the mineral particles themselves don’t degrade or become dangerous over time,” says associate professor Yousuf Mohammed from the University of Queensland’s Frazer Institute.

But the other ingredients in mineral sunscreens do degrade, and the cream can separate from the mineral particles, he says.

The active ingredients that protect you from the sun won’t be spread evenly across your skin, leaving you with sections that are less protected聽

“What happens here is that the particles settle down in the sunscreen and won’t be distributed evenly throughout it.”

So when you put an expired physical sunscreen on, the particles with the active ingredients that protect you from the sun won’t be spread evenly across your skin, leaving you with sections that are less protected from UV rays.听

Chemical sunscreen

“On the other hand, the ingredients in chemical sunscreens can degrade over time,” says Mohammed, who has a PhD in pharmaceutics and skin drug delivery.

“Other ingredients such as preservatives can break down over time, potentially causing irritation in some sensitive individuals, as well reducing the effectiveness of the product.”

Can I still use expired sunscreen?

No. If your sunscreen has passed the use by or expiry date, you should throw it out.

And regardless of what the date on the tube says, it’s important to check the consistency 鈥 it can give you an indication of whether or not it’s gone bad ahead of time.

Here’s some general advice.

  • If your mineral sunscreen has separated or feels gritty, watery or lumpy, it won’t be as effective as it should be, so you should probably replace it.
  • That tube of chemical sunscreen that’s been sitting in the glovebox for years? Definitely chuck it.
Text-only accessible version

How to tell if your sunscreen has gone bad

  • Check the expiry 鈥 is it out of date?聽
  • Has it been exposed to high temperatures for a prolonged period (e.g. stored in the glove box of a car in the heat)?
  • Have the ingredients separated or do the contents watery, lumpy or gritty?聽

If you answered yes to one or more, dispose of your sunscreen and buy a new one.

How to store sunscreen

Heat is sunscreen’s biggest enemy. It causes the ingredients to break down faster, which is ironic considering that sunscreens are mostly used in high heat settings, says Mohammed.

“My research shows rapid degradation of sunscreens from heat and from being left in full sun, like leaving them in the car or on your beach towel,” he says. “Storing sunscreen in a cool, dry place can prolong its shelf life.”聽

To stop your sunscreen degrading before the expiry date, store it below 30掳C, out of direct sunlight, and away from other heat sources.听

If you’re outdoors, keep it in the shade or wrapped in a towel.

How much sunscreen do I need to apply?

How much sunscreen do I need?

“Most people don’t put on enough sunscreen in the first place,” says Craig Dennyson, spokesperson for Eurofins Dermatest Australia, a company that lab tests sunscreens.听

“But if you take the risk of using a sunscreen that’s expired or degraded 鈥 or one that doesn’t meet the SPF claim on the label 鈥 then it’ll give you even less protection.”

The recommended amount of sunscreen for adults is 5mL or one teaspoon for each area of the body, which equates to 2mg per square centimetre of skin. But most people don’t apply that much.

The recommended amount is one teaspoon for each area of the body, but most people don’t apply that much

“Say your sunscreen is labelled SPF 50 but only delivers SPF 30 protection. If you only put on half the recommended amount, then that brings the protection down to more like SPF 8,” says Dennyson.

And if you factor in things like sweat, swimming, towelling off and so on, he adds, you’ll be getting even less protection again.

“This is why it’s so important to check the expiry date and store it correctly 鈥 but to also make sure the sunscreen you’re buying actually lives up to the SPF level on its label in the first place.听

“And of course, always make sure you’re applying and reapplying it properly.”

What’s the correct amount of sunscreen to apply?

To ensure you’re getting the full effects of your sunscreen, you need to apply a lot more than you probably realise.

To be properly covered, you need to apply seven teaspoons, one for each section of your body:

  • 1 teaspoon for face, neck and ears
  • 1 for the front of your torso
  • 1 for the back of your torso
  • 1 for each arm
  • 1 for each leg.

Not applying it often enough (every two hours), not reapplying after swimming or exercising, and inadvertently rubbing it off on clothing, towels and so on can also reduce its effectiveness.

You need more than sunscreen to be sun-safe

Sunscreen is just one line of defence against the sun’s ultraviolet (UV) radiation.听

For the best protection, don’t forget to cover up with clothing or a rash vest, wear a sunscreen that meets its SPF claims, wear a hat and sunglasses, and stay in the shade when possible.

The post Can your sunscreen expire? appeared first on 糖心Vlog.

]]>
767530 expiry-dates-of-six-sunscreens