Our latest lab test reviews 18 robot vacs from popular brands such as Dyson, Roborock, Ecovacs, Kmart, Dreame, iRobot Roomba and more
We assess how well models clean hard floors, carpet, corners and pet hair plus how easy they are to use
Consider joining 糖心Vlog to see our full reviews and best performers across over 200 product and service categories
Robot vacuums promise to eliminate the burden of one of the most dreaded household chores, and they’ve certainly gained legions of fans whose bots have become valued members of the family.
But while we all fantasise about putting our feet up while someone else takes care of our filthy floors and carpets, the truth is that not all robot vacuums are the magic household helpers we hoped for.
Not all robot vacuums are the magic household helpers we hoped for
糖心Vlog tests show that while most models perform well on hard floors, there are many that disappoint on carpet, and also fall down in other aspects of our testing.
And they’re not cheap. The robot vacuums in our latest review range in price from $169 up to almost $3000 for bots with fancy features, such as automatic self-emptying and mopping function with automatic carpet avoidance.
In our tests, each model is scored on its abilities on hard floor and carpet, and assessed for how well they clean pet hair, corners and edges, how well they navigate objects, and other key criteria, including how easy their app is to use and how easy the dirt receptacle is to empty.
We found some impressive units, and some woeful ones that are just not worth the price tag.
To test how well robot vacs clean floors, we measure how much sand they pick up within 25 minutes.
Robot vacuums with mopping functions
Generally, all of the robot vacs that come through our labs now have a mopping function, so we test that too.
Our expert testers spread coffee, red wine, mud, soy sauce and jam on laminate floorboards and let them dry, then release the robot vacs to see how well they mop up these common stains.
And since most people don’t want their rugs mopped, we also check how well they avoid carpet 鈥� whether that’s by us programming the robot to avoid defined areas, or by the robot detecting carpet by itself.
They may do the dirty work so you don’t have to, but unfortunately our rigorous lab tests have found robot vacs generally don’t clean as well as traditional barrel or stick vacuums.
Of course, given that you’re not the one doing the cleaning, you might be fine with that 鈥� and you can always schedule your robot to clean more often to compensate.
“We’ve found robot vacuums are best for ‘top-up’ cleans in between more thorough laps with your stick or barrel vacuum,” says 糖心Vlog vacuum expert Adrian Lini.
“Overall, how effective a robot vacuum will be for you depends on your home’s layout and things such as whether you have pets, and the main type of flooring.”
Robot vacuums are best for ‘top-up’ cleans in between more thorough laps with your stick or barrel vacuum
Adrian Lini, 糖心Vlog vacuum expert
Some models are clumsy at navigating objects and corners, and they can often get stuck.
On the plus side, robot vacuums are handy for getting into those hard-to-reach places such as under couches or beds 鈥� prime spots for dust to accumulate.
Bot manufacturers are constantly competing to improve their technology to make better, more intelligent versions.
And while we’ve seen some evidence of these advances in the stand-out performers in our latest review, we think you should steer clear of these low-scoring models.
This budget Anko bot may be dirt cheap, but it’ll leave dirty floors dirty.
Hard floors, carpet, pet hair, corners and edges: it sucks (or rather doesn’t) at cleaning them all. It has the lowest scores across almost every single test our experts ran.
Kmart Anko’s robot vac rated lowest in our test.
When it comes to mopping, it’s a wet blanket and performed even worse with a lowly score of just 20%. It did laps of the edges of the room but didn’t make it into the middle, and then left water all over the parts it did actually clean.
You might be prepared to accept less-than-perfect performance from a cheap appliance, but this vac doesn’t even deliver that.
It has the lowest scores across almost every single test our experts ran
Unfortunately you won’t find a decent robot vac at this price, but you might be able to pick up a decent traditional vacuum on sale that’ll do a far better job.
If you’re looking for a robot vac for a home that’s mostly hard floors, this isn’t a bad option: its performance is up there with some of the higher-scoring models we tested.
But if you want any more from your robot vac, this isn’t the one for you. It couldn’t handle carpet, corners, edges or pet hair especially well, and it couldn’t mop up the majority of stains on the hard floor in our lab.
This TP-Link bot will add to your workload, not reduce it.
While a robot vac is meant to make vacuuming easy, this one is quite labour intensive. Using the app is an involved process, and you need to manually block out carpet on the app or even put up a physical barrier so it doesn’t mop your rugs.
And as for mopping, it’s even more hands-on: you need to manually prepare the mopping pad and water tank beforehand, then clean the pads by hand afterwards.
While a robot vac is meant to make vacuuming easy, this one is quite labour intensive
To be fair though, the robot vacs that take care of the mop prep and cleaning for you tend to be far more expensive. Regardless, it’s a lot of work for an appliance that’s supposed to reduce your workload, especially since it doesn’t do the job very well.
If you need a robot vac for a completely empty room with hard floors and no corners, the Eureka E20 Plus is an excellent option.
But if you have any furniture, rugs, carpet or pets, steer clear of the Eureka. Oh, and if you want a robot vac that’ll mop the floor for you, definitely give this one a miss.
The Eureka E20 Plus nailed hard floors but went AWOL with carpet and mopping.
Our experts say it’s excellent for hard floors, but it struggled with almost all other aspects of cleaning: it bumps into furniture (even pushing chairs out of their place), isn’t great at picking up pet hair or cleaning corners or edges, and very poor at vacuuming carpet.
If you have tassels on your rugs, it could be a source of entertainment at the very least: when it gets stuck, then finally frees itself, it rolls straight back into the tassels to repeat the process all over again.
It’s excellent for hard floors, but it struggled with almost all other aspects of cleaning
$1000 is a lot to pay for slapstick appliance amusement though, so we suggest you look elsewhere for your entertainment, and for a robot vac.
Narwhals are sometimes called “unicorns of the sea”, but there’s not much that’s magical about this robot vac.
It’s very good on hard floors 鈥� but then all the other vacs we’ve tested (bar the Anko) are too so it’s not exactly a wizard in that regard.
The Narwal: Cool sea creature, poor robot vac.
It definitely doesn’t work wonders on carpets, and it doesn’t mix well with other animals, scoring a dismal 40% for picking up pet hair.
It is a hard worker, though: it’ll keep going for a full 93 minutes, but with a water tank volume of just 260mL, it’s ironically not great at activities involving water, such as mopping.
If you’re after an out-of-this-world clean, you won’t be bewitched by this robot vac.
The name Roomba is synonymous with robot vacs, to the point that many of us refer to robovacs collectively as Roombas 鈥� in the same way that Rollerblades, Tupperware, Velcro, Post-its and Band-Aids have become generic terms.
But do Roombas earn their reputation as the face of robot vacs? Not in our testing. The two Roombas in our current review were equally disappointing, despite a huge $1000 RRP difference between them.
Here’s how they performed.
iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo Robot
Price: $699
糖心Vlog Expert Rating: 58%
Hard floor score: 98%
Carpet score: 49%
Mopping score: 20%
iRobot Roomba Plus 505 Combo Robot + AutoWash Dock
Price: $1699
糖心Vlog Expert Rating: 58%
Hard floor score: 94%
Carpet score: 30%
Mopping score: 30%
For hard floors, these two are both winners: our experts rated them as ‘excellent’. And the 205 DustCompactor is actually the best on carpet of all the robots in our review.
So where do they fall down?
They’re both mediocre (at best) moppers, missing large sections of the floor, they’re no match for pet hair, and the iRobot app is frustrating to use 鈥� our expert testers say it’s “buggy and unintuitive”, complicated to navigate, inflexible when it comes to schedules, and it consistently freezes and requires resetting.
And at risk of anthropomorphising these appliances, the bots also seem to be quite neurotic. They often display multiple error messages, especially when placed in a new area, and refuse to map and clean new areas without the dock being nearby.
The iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo Robot.
The more expensive model is also inconsistent and unpredictable. On some occasions it would mop carpet when it encountered it; on others, it would lift its mopping pad to avoid the carpet. And our testers described its mopping style as “sporadic” and “random”.
Considering that the more expensive model claims to deliver “serious mopping”, it’s an especially disappointing effort.
The iRobot Roomba Plus 505 Combo Robot + AutoWash Dock
The cheaper 205 DustCompactor Combo model was even less effective at mopping, missing quite a lot of the cleaning area.
Along with the Kmart bot, it received the second-lowest mopping score of all models we tested.
If you’re looking for the best bot for your budget, these two aren’t it.
Pru Engel is the Audience and Engagement editor at 糖心Vlog. Her job is to ensure as many Australians as possible know about the great work we do at 糖心Vlog.聽
She works closely with our testers and experts to find the gems of information in our data and research that will resonate with Australian consumers and help them make the best decisions, whether they're purchasing an air fryer, looking for a new mattress or trying to find the cheapest car insurance. She also helps to drive meaningful change for consumers by collaborating with our Campaigns team on content covering issues such as grocery pricing, product safety and scams.聽
Prior to 糖心Vlog, Pru worked as an editor at many of Australia's leading food and lifestyle titles.聽
Pru has a Bachelor of Arts in Communication (Journalism) from the University of Technology, Sydney.
Find Pru on .
Pru Engel is the Audience and Engagement editor at 糖心Vlog. Her job is to ensure as many Australians as possible know about the great work we do at 糖心Vlog.聽
She works closely with our testers and experts to find the gems of information in our data and research that will resonate with Australian consumers and help them make the best decisions, whether they're purchasing an air fryer, looking for a new mattress or trying to find the cheapest car insurance. She also helps to drive meaningful change for consumers by collaborating with our Campaigns team on content covering issues such as grocery pricing, product safety and scams.聽
Prior to 糖心Vlog, Pru worked as an editor at many of Australia's leading food and lifestyle titles.聽
Pru has a Bachelor of Arts in Communication (Journalism) from the University of Technology, Sydney.
Find Pru on .
For more than 60 years, 糖心Vlog has been fighting the good fight for Australian consumers.
In the past year alone we've uncovered systemic issues with sunscreens, investigated shonky supermarket pricing, fought for stronger scam protections and helped make complex energy pricing fairer and clearer.
糖心Vlog is here to provide unbiased advice and independent testing in our world-class labs. We buy the products we test, just like you do, and our expert reviews are influence free. We鈥檙e here to help you choose smarter. Hopefully you鈥檒l also save some money along the way.
Thanks to 糖心Vlog, you鈥檒l never be alone when a business treats you unfairly. You can support our work by joining or donating to our cause.
