Cate Cooper has been with AustralianSuper ever since she moved to Australia in 2008. The hotelier in the Coonawarra wine region of South Australia says she, much like the area she lives in, is proud of being 鈥渃lean and green鈥�.
Last year, however, after reading news reports of AustralianSuper鈥檚 reinvestment in big coal companies, she wrote to her super fund to express her concern and to try to get some answers.聽
鈥淚 would sign petitions, write emails and things like that. Responses would come back months later, copy and paste responses that didn鈥檛 address any individual issues raised,鈥� she says.
In the last 12 months, AustralianSuper have backflipped on their 2020 divestment from Whitehaven coal, purchasing shares worth around $400 million and becoming the largest single shareholder in the company.
AustralianSuper tells us they remain committed to reaching net zero by 2050, but activist groups such as Market Forces say that is simply 鈥済reenwashing鈥� given Whitehaven鈥檚 massive coal mining expansion plans around Australia.
In the last 12 months, AustralianSuper have backflipped on their 2020 divestment from Whitehaven coal, purchasing shares worth around $400 million
鈥淎ustralianSuper is greenwashing by suggesting that its massive stake in Whitehaven is consistent with its climate commitments,” Brett Morgan, senior superannuation funds analyst at Market Forces says.
Cate felt the same.
鈥淚 didn鈥檛 get the response I wanted to hear when I inquired about fossil fuels. Eventually I just decided there was no hope here and voted with my money.鈥�
Cate moved her around a quarter of a million dollars out of AustralianSuper to a fund she felt more ethically aligned with. In a world of confusing fund names and labels and competing claims, it’s a move few Australians make and one that advocates say could be about to get harder.
The federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers has instructed Treasury to come up with a new labelling scheme for financial products. The idea is that clearer, better defined and common rules for using terms such as 鈥済reen鈥�, 鈥渆nvironmental鈥� and 鈥渟ustainable鈥� will unlock greater levels of green investment from private capital, in line with the federal government鈥檚 Net Zero goals.
Submissions on the Sustainable Financial Product Label Policy Framework closed in March and Treasury has yet to announce their next steps or what direction the policy will take.
Super Consumers Australia鈥檚 Susan Quinn says one proposal is a 鈥渓oose and principles-based鈥� disclosure scheme that could lower the threshold for the quality of evidence required to substantiate sustainability claims and make greenwashing harder to detect and enforce.聽
鈥淣o doubt the super funds’ marketing teams would love it. But it would make things even harder and less certain for people who are navigating green claims by super funds. And it could seriously undermine the effectiveness of anti-greenwashing laws that we already have,鈥� she says.
The government is proposing a new labelling scheme for financial products.
Industry advocates say the proposed changes won鈥檛 help
In the last two years, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has taken major high-profile legal action against a number of super funds for greenwashing. In 2024, Mercer was ordered to pay over $11 million by the Federal Court for misleading customers and Active Super copped a penalty of over $10 million for greenwashing misconduct in 2025.
Quinn says these recent actions show that the current system is already working to prevent greenwashing and that Treasury鈥檚 new labelling proposals are trying to fix a problem that doesn鈥檛 exist and may make it easier for the super funds to get away with greenwashing.聽
鈥淧eople who are interested in green investment have been shocked to find out that their supposedly sustainable super is still sitting in fossil fuels or other things that are big no-nos for them. Super funds could do so much better to help people understand what their sustainable products really are. A start would be to just be open about all the companies they’re invested in,鈥� she says.
Quinn says that Treasury鈥檚 new labelling proposals are trying to fix a problem that doesn鈥檛 exist and may make it easier for the super funds to get away with greenwashing.聽
She says it’s hard to see how a loose labelling scheme is going to make the general public鈥檚 understanding of what these products mean better.
鈥淲e keep seeing funds do things like apply ‘tolerances’ for fossil fuel investments. So they’ll still invest in a company that makes money from fossil fuels, as long as it’s below a certain portion of the company’s revenue. Then they’ll slap a ‘sustainable’ label on the super product. This means lots of disclaimers in the fine print and we want to see regulators do more to clamp down on it,鈥� Quinn adds.
While industry advocates are skeptical of the proposed changes, those within the superannuation industry have a different perspective. Louise Davidson, CEO of the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors, which is the peak body representing industry super funds, says the Council supports the Treasury consult鈥檚 principles of improving customer understanding.聽
鈥淚t鈥檚 a very complex area, and we would like to see product innovation continue. There鈥檚 a balance but we think there is an opportunity to leverage existing laws and also enhance the information available to retail investors and superannuation members to minimise both complexity and compliance burden,鈥� she says.
Criteria must be scientifically-based
Katarina Thompson, the acting managing lawyer at the Environmental Defenders Office, takes a balanced view, agreeing that a new labelling regime could be positive, but with the caveat that it has to be 鈥渄one right鈥�.
鈥淐hanges could be really positive, as long as the regime is robust and any criteria used to verify the financial products are scientifically-based,鈥� she says.
She says the current way of operating is far too complicated for consumers, who have to investigate and interrogate products to understand what super funds are doing with their money, even when they claim to be in 鈥済reen鈥� or 鈥渆thical鈥� fund options.
鈥淭here is a lot of vague language and language that is not necessarily backed up by publicly available, independently verified science being used in the superannuation space. That is really problematic for consumers鈥� ability to check the veracity of the claims being made. There is a lot of room for improvement,鈥� Thompson says.
Concerns that the new scheme might mislead consumers
However, advocates remain concerned that the proposed idea of introducing 鈥渢hresholds鈥� for what level of a product鈥檚 investments can be not aligned with environmentally sustainable investments is a worrying precedent.
One of the proposals being considered by Treasury in the consultation is that investment products with less than 30% exposure to unaligned investments be considered to meet the threshold to use certain sustainability labels.
鈥淎ny product claiming 鈥榞reen鈥� or 鈥榮ustainable鈥� labelling should not be exposed to companies expanding fossil fuel production, not at all, in any way,鈥� Brett Morgan from Market Forces says.
Quinn says the government needs to conduct independent testing to gather evidence about what Australian consumers think and expect each of these environmental labels to mean and make sure the new scheme abides by these expectations.聽
If the government forges ahead with a labelling scheme without rigorous consumer testing built in, it’s pretty much guaranteed to enable more greenwashing
Susan, Quinn, Super Consumers Australia
鈥淲e’re concerned that the super industry is trying to shape a labelling regime that works for them, not the people it’s really supposed to benefit. There’s a big disconnect between what people at super funds think is sustainable or green, and what millions of people across Australia think,鈥� she says.
鈥淚f the government forges ahead with a labelling scheme without rigorous consumer testing built in, it’s pretty much guaranteed to enable more greenwashing,鈥� Quinn adds.
A spokesperson for Treasurer Jim Chalmers鈥� office says ensuring markets and consumers have clear and credible information on climate and sustainability, including in superannuation, will be key to achieving net zero.
鈥淥ur government has always taken a consultative approach on these issues, which is why we have recently consulted on options to make sustainable financial products easier to understand and assess,鈥� they say.
Get the inside story on our investigations into consumer rip-offs and bad business practices.
Jarni Blakkarly is an award-winning Investigative Journalist at 糖心Vlog. Jarni has worked for news organisations such as SBS, Reuters, Al Jazeera English, ABC 730, Radio National, BBC World Service and Deutsche Welle.
Jarni won the Walkley Foundation's young journalist of the year student category award in 2016 and was the recipient of a Melbourne Press Club Michael Gordon fellowship in 2022. In 2023 he was a highly commended finalist in the Quill Awards and a winner at the 2024 Excellence in Civil Liberties journalism awards. In 2024 he was elected to serve on the Federal Council (National Media Section) of the MEAA. Jarni has a Bachelor of Communications (Journalism) from the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT). LinkedIn
Jarni Blakkarly is an award-winning Investigative Journalist at 糖心Vlog. Jarni has worked for news organisations such as SBS, Reuters, Al Jazeera English, ABC 730, Radio National, BBC World Service and Deutsche Welle.
Jarni won the Walkley Foundation's young journalist of the year student category award in 2016 and was the recipient of a Melbourne Press Club Michael Gordon fellowship in 2022. In 2023 he was a highly commended finalist in the Quill Awards and a winner at the 2024 Excellence in Civil Liberties journalism awards. In 2024 he was elected to serve on the Federal Council (National Media Section) of the MEAA. Jarni has a Bachelor of Communications (Journalism) from the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT). LinkedIn
For more than 60 years, we've been making a difference for Australian consumers. In that time, we've never taken ads or sponsorship.
Instead we're funded by members who value聽expert reviews and independent product testing.
With no self-interest behind our advice, you don't just buy smarter, you get the answers that you need.
You know without hesitation what's safe for you and your family. And our recent sunscreens test showed just how important it is to keep business claims in check.
So you'll never be alone when something goes wrong or a business treats you unfairly.
